Whose values?
According to the Department of Immigration and Border
Control website, current applicants for permanent and some temporary visas have
to sign the following statement:
“I
understand:
- Australian society values respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual, freedom of religion, commitment to the rule of law, Parliamentary democracy, equality of men and women and a spirit of egalitarianism that embraces mutual respect, tolerance, fair play and compassion for those in need and pursuit of the public good
- Australian society values equality of opportunity for individuals, regardless of their race, religion or ethnic background
- the English language, as the national language, is an important unifying element of Australian society.
I
undertake to respect these values of Australian society during my stay in
Australia and to obey the laws of Australia.”
So why introduce a new, or additional, values test for those
applying for citizenship? Leaving aside
the fact that neither the current values statements, nor the new additions, are
uniquely Australian, what exactly is wrong with the set of statements we
already have? I can think of only one reason for this announcement and these
changes – to pander to the far-right and the media focus on Pauline Hanson and
those with similar views.
Rather than let the far-right determine the agenda and force
policy, the government should examine its own values and see if they are up to
their own standards. Let’s start with
the three values statements above:
If Australian society values ‘the equality of men and women’, why is the nationwide gender pay gap for full time workers 16% according to the government’s own statistics?
Gender Pay Gap
If Australian society values ‘a spirit of egalitarianism that embraces mutual respect, tolerance, fair play and compassion for those in need and pursuit of the public good’, then how can 48 millionaires pay no tax – tax that funds education, healthcare, infrastructure, welfare – i.e. the public good?
Millionaires Who Don't Pay Tax
If Australian society values equality of opportunity for individuals regardless of ethnic background, why are the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia not recognized in the country’s constitution?
Recognise
Why is English the only recognized language of Australia when there are more than 120 indigenous Australian languages still spoken of the more than 250 that were here at the time of European settlement? Why aren’t these languages part of our national identity, properly valued and protected and taught at school?
Indigenous Australian Languages
Perhaps this government should look at its own values and
ask itself what it is doing to ensure we live in a truly egalitarian society
that celebrates all Australians and their cultures?
And for the record
·
No, it is not ok to beat your spouse under any
circumstances
·
No, it is not ok to support or take part in
terrorist activities
·
No, it is not ok to mutilate female genitals
under any circumstances
·
No, it is not ok to force a minor into marriage
There are laws to enforce these things and all Australians have to obey the law –
immigrant or not.
But
·
Yes, it is ok to stand up to bigotry, misogyny
and racism
·
Yes, it is ok to show compassion to refugees and
those who are under threat of violence or discrimination of any kind
·
Yes, it is ok to clamp down on tax avoidance, both
by individuals and large multi-national corporations and ensure we all pay our
fair share
·
Yes, it is ok to show proper respect to the
original peoples of Australia as well as to the myriad of cultural groups that
make up our modern country.
So, Prime Minister – stop your popularist grandstanding and
do something more constructive instead.
Perhaps start by funding better education for all Australians about the
real issues.
Mark O’Neil
Proud Australian citizen since 2013
Comments
Post a Comment